Jim Hull's Story Fanatic

This is Story Fanatic, a collection of articles covering story structure and analysis for
creative writers. Published weekly.

What Character Arc Really Means

What Character Arc Really Means

September 24, 2009

When asked to define character arc, most people think it has something to do with how the Main Character changes within a story. While in some respect this is correct, it is inaccurate to assume that this means every Main Character needs to undergo some major transformation. Understanding the difference between growth and change is essential to the proper implementation of character arc in a story.

Without a doubt, Main Characters need to grow. A story cannot develop organically if the principal characters within it do not grow and adapt to the shifting dramatic tides. When an act progresses from one area of exploration to the next, the Main Character needs to progress as well. That’s how stories work. Therefore, it is easy to see how growth, and in particular the Main Character’s growth, is inherent in the mechanisms that run story.

But when you talk about change and how the Main Character “has” to change, you’re making an assumption about the nature of that growth. Not all growth is transformative. Sometimes a person can grow by maintaining their position, shoring up their resolve against whatever is thrown at them. This is no less meaningful than the kind of growth where someone changes who they are or how they see the world.

The following is a collection of Main Characters who do NOT fundamentally change over the course of the story:

When the Main Character reaches the crisis point or climax of a story they are faced with a very important question: are they on the right path or the wrong path? Some stories are about characters who realize they have been doing things wrong the whole time. These characters change and adopt a new way of seeing the world. Other stories are about characters who realize that the way they have been doing things is in fact the right way to approach their problems. These characters remain steadfast. In both cases, this realization that they arrive at is an extension of, or better yet, result of their growth.

Now whether or not their decision turns out to be a good thing or a bad thing is a completely different area of discussion. The takeaway here is that in assuming that every Main Character has to change, you are effectively ignoring or discounting fifty percent of the stories out there. And we’re not talking about weak stories or stories that have problems. Amadeus, The Silence of the Lambs, Chinatown, the list goes on and on. These are fantastic stories that are on the top of every Top 100 list. Non-transformative growth can be a powerful means of expressing an author’s point-of-view.

Again, understanding the difference between growth and change is the key. Not all growth requires a different mindset. As the video above clearly shows, there is great meaning to be found in stories where a character’s “arc” requires them to stand their ground.

Published on:
Written by:
Jim Hull
Preferred short link:
http://storyfanatic.com/ss/1948
Filed under:
Story Structure
Topics covered:
main character resolve
steadfast main character

Further Reading

Enhance your understanding of story with these related articles.

    Previous

    Determining the Mind of a Main Character

    The mental sex of a Main Character is an integral part of the structure of story. Not only does it determine how the Main Character will go about solving problems, but it is also responsible for the order in which events happen in a story.

    Determining the Mind of a Main Character

    Next

    Gender and The Little Mermaid

    If you want to write a screenplay or story that appeals to a unique audience demographic, you must pay special close attention to the way that story is structured. Male and female audience members differ on the kinds of stories that appeal to them the most.

    Gender and The Little Mermaid
Sign up for the Monthly Newsletter